The papers analyze various possibilities for a safety zone and cite statistics textually as part of the analysis. The parties have identified expert witnesses and agreed to a timetable for exchange of expert reports. 1986) (rejecting request for discovery). Except as provided in Code of Civil Procedure section 437c (r) and rule 3.1351, the opposition to a motion must consist of the following separate documents, titled as shown: (1) [ Opposing party's] memorandum in opposition to [ moving party's] motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication or both; Ct. (1980) 111 Cal. App. Health. "G,*X+%G" &2X 'XG TG *'TG2X+G, 2L "2*(G&T, "ng Appasktkaj snfii hg hfsgd aj tnks Appasktkaj! 1. Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Defendant to Provide Further Responses and Request for Sanctions is DENIED. will be able to access it on trellis. These local rules are promulgated pursuant to 28 U.S.C. California Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 2016.040. : C16 Complaint Filed: December 3, 2014 Trial Date: May 8, 2017 DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S . The statistics and other data contained in those documents reflect the deliberative processes of the Antitrust Division. 2. Legal Standard A separate statement is a separate document filed and served with the discovery motion that provides all the information necessary to understand each discovery request and all the responses to it that are at issue. Sample language could read: I hereby certify that on this 22nd day of April, 2016, I caused a copy of the foregoing Motion in Opposition to be served by first-class mail, postage prepaid, on counsel for plaintiff as follows, and then insert the name and address of counsel. If the requested information wasnt relevant, then you might not feel they are entitled to it. That request focused solely on pre-decisional documents and unquestionably invaded the intragovernmental deliberative processes of the Antitrust Division. (Code Civ. R. Civ. This sample opposition to a motion to compel further responses to requests for production of documents in California is made on the grounds that the requests for production of documents are objectionable in that the documents requested clearly do not relate to the claim or defense of the party seeking discovery or of any other party to the action as required by Code of Civil Procedure 2017. . Defendants cite two cases regarding production of factual material which do not apply to the facts of this case. A motion concerning interrogatories, inspection demands, or admission requests must identify the interrogatories, demands, or requests by set and number. The district court denied Sundance's motion to compel arbitration based on waiver. Proc., 2030.290(a), 2031.300(a). For example, if you are a journalist, then you might have a statutory privilege not to be compelled to release the sources of your information. Exhibit 1 at 1. ), Rules of Court, rule 3.1348(a), explains, The court may award sanctions under the Discovery Act in favor of a party who files a motion to compel discovery, even though no opposition to the motion was filed, or opposition to the motion was withdrawn, or the requested discovery was provided to the moving party after motion was filed. (See also Code Civ. A separate attachment cites and annotates certain references on hospital size, followed by an analysis of those references and other information in connection with a possible safe harbor. You can always see your envelopes (The ninth document is a document of the Federal Trade Commission; therefore the Division has referred that document to the Commission to determine whether it has any privilege to assert regarding its discovery.). NLRB v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 421 U.S. 132, 138 (1974). You will lose the information in your envelope, Miscellaneous Document Filed - SEPARATE STATEMENT OF DISCOVERY REQUESTS AN, BEAL -V- WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL Print. [and/or] (2) An objection to a particular request is without merit or too general. Even if defendants had made such allegations, it is well settled that exercises of prosecutorial discretion are, for the most part, not judiciable. Defendant filed oppositions on February 10, 2020. Last. CASE NAME: will be able to access it on trellis. In accordance with Fed. You should receive a copy of the other side's motion that was filed with the court. Signed this ______________ day of August, 1994. The parties may submit to the tentative ruling without appearing for the hearing if you follow these instructions: (1) If ALL PARTIES (except if no other part ..court.org, at least one day prior to the hearing date, to advise the Court that ALL PARTIES SUBMIT, also STATING WHICH PARTY WILL GIVE NOTICE, or if NOTICE IS WAIVED; (3) Please refrain from sending individual emails to smcdept46@lacourt.org with a request to modify the tentative ruling or indicate one party submits but waiting to hear from the other side, as these emails will not be considered. will be able to access it on trellis. try clicking the minimize button instead. United States v. Jacob, 781 F.2d 643, 646-47 (8th Cir. (CCP 2030.300) These are the Local Rules of Practice in Civil Proceedings before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. To compel further responses to requests for admission; To compel further responses to interrogatories; To compel further responses to a demand for inspection of documents or tangible things; To compel or to quash the production of documents or tangible things at a deposition; For medical examination over objection; and. A two-page May 25, 1993 draft paper discussing possible safe harbor for hospital mergers. Proc., 2025.450 (b) (2) .) As soon as you receive this motion, read it carefully. R. Civ. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. VS THE ALLERGY AND ASTHMA CLINI, Motion to Compel Discovery Responses (CCP 2030.300), Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories, Motion for Order Deeming Admitted Truth of Facts and Genuineness of Documents, La Paloma Ranch LLC et al vs Presbyterian Camp and Conference Centers, Inc. et al. Proc., 2030.290(a), 2031.300(a).) He received his JD from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1998 and his PhD in American History from the University of Oregon in 2013. They were created during the prosecutorial and policy deliberations leading up to publication of the Policy Statements and safety zones. The responding party has 30 days after the service of requests to object and answer. may be governed by the Code of Civil Procedure ("C.C.P."), the California Rules of Court ("C.R.C."), local court rules, or all three. The staff selected for inclusion in the documents all tables, maps and other statistical or numerical information. See Write an Affidavit for more information. Providence Journal Co. v. Dep't of the Army, 981 F.2d 552, 562 (1st Cir. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. 4. THOMPSON VS CONTINENTAL LABOR RESOURCES, INC. Motion to Compel 12/04/2018 - Motion to Compel, Motion to Compel - def Reeder's Motion to Compel Pltf Barmore to File Unde, Barmore et al -v- Circa Management, Inc. et al Print, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL AND REQUEST SANCTIONS, DEFENDANT, MICHELLE HUANG ET AL VS. SANDEEP ANDRE HINGORANI ET AL, Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatories, Motion to Compel Responses to Request for Production of Documents, Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories, Motion to Compel Deposition of Person Most Qualified (PMQ). The Antitrust Division has referred that document to the FTC for its evaluation of whether it is privileged. This is a controversial step. All that need be shown in the moving papers is that a set of interrogatories was properly served on the opposing party, that the time to respond has expired, and that no response of any kind has been served. Nature of Proceedings: Motions Compel Further Resp. Except as provided in 3.1345(b), any motion involving the content of a discovery request or the responses to such a request must be accompanied by a separate statement. Sundance did not initially move to compel arbitration or stay the case. They were developed by staff attorneys and economists of the Antitrust Division of the Justice Department solely to aid the Assistant Attorney General in charge of that Division in deliberating on the question of whether to develop a safety zone for hospital mergers and to decide the standard for that safety zone. We understand defendants agree that their motion is moot in light of this contemplated discovery. ( If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, That the defendants did not plead any defense related to the government's exercise of prosecutorial discretion nor challenge the allegations of the Complaint under Fed. Ballesteros, Daniel Walter 2 I am familiar with the document requests served on plaintiff, the United States of America, by the defendants in the above-captioned case, as amended by defendants' memorandum in support of their Motion to Compel, seeking documents related to the Safety Zone for hospital mergers contained in the Statements of Antitrust Enforcement Policy in the Health Care Area, issued by the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission on September 15, 1993 ("Policy Statements"). If the judge asks questions, then stand quietly and dont interrupt the judge. Plaintiffs Combined Motion to Compel Further Responses to Form, Special Interrogatories and Requests for Admissions, and Sanctions (Cal. The discovery request was too vague or ambiguous. Primarily, defendants seemed to be suggesting that they would shift the focus of the request to post-issuance documents. Clinton M. Sandvick worked as a civil litigator in California for over 7 years. Movant J. Doe ("Doe") hereby submits this Separate Statement pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.1345 in support of Doe's motion to quash a subpoena issued to non-party Glassdoor, Inc. . He received his JD from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1998 and his PhD in American History from the University of Oregon in 2013. A critical but often neglected (or haphazardly prepared) document which is necessary when making a motion to compel further responses to written discovery is the "separate statement" which is required under Rule 3.1345 of the California Rules of Court. Proc., 2031.300(a).) Plaintiff Nicole Jacksons LLCs (1) Motion To Compel Further Responses To Form Interrogatories, Set One; Request For Monetary Sanctions; and (2) Motion To Compel Further Responses To Requests For Production, Set One; Request For Monetary Sanctio ..s to Compel Further Responses on September 12, 2019. (a) Scope. Your subscription has successfully been upgraded. This is a good sample of separate statement required for bringing motion to compel further responses. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. : 1 aj tng ca`pigtg lkigs fjd, rgcards al tnks fctkaj! A similar document, not described in the Confidential Schedule, was prepared by the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC"). Deft's Form Interrog (Set 1) to Eric Hvolboll/Req. (See also Mills v. U.S. Bank (2008) 166 Cal.App.4th 871, 892-893 (trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiffs motion to compel discovery as plaintiffs separate statement did not comply with the rules of court); Neary v. Regents of University of California (1986) 185 Cal.App.3d 1136, 1145 (trial court properly denied motions to compel discovery because of nonconforming separate statements). try clicking the minimize button instead. (Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2007; adopted as subd (b); previously amended effective July 1, 1987; previously relettered effective July 1, 2001.). (Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2007; previously repealed and adopted effective July 1, 2001. On July 29, 1994, the United States offered to consider the modified request without requiring defendants to file a new pleading, but sought assurances from defendants that the request was properly understood and some articulation of the possible relevance of the request. (Set 1) to Eric Hvolboll/Req. A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States. Failure to comply with this requirement of a separate statement may constitute a sufficient ground, in the court's discretion, for granting the motion. for Prod. James J. DiCesare - Dept. We will email you Defendants' proposed transaction does not fall within the safety zone for hospital mergers, and defendants have so stipulated. (Code Civ. If these officials and staff anticipate subsequent disclosure and inquisition regarding their views, they will be inclined to temper candor and to restrict advice with resulting detriment to the policy-making process, enforcement of the antitrust laws, and the public interest. For example, the other side might have served requests for production of emails relating to a topic. Proc., 203 MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR DOCUMENTS, FORM INTERROGATORIES, AND REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION Disclosure of the tables, maps, statistics and numerical information would reveal the thinking of staff as to which facts were relevant to the deliberations leading up to issuance of the Policy Statements. The motions that require a separate statement include a motion: (1) To compel further responses to requests for admission; (2) To compel further responses to interrogatories; (3) To compel further responses to a demand for inspection of documents or tangible things; (5) To compel or to quash the production of documents or tangible things at a deposition; (6) For medical examination over objection; and, (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective July 1, 1987, January 1, 1992, January 1, 1997, and July 1, 2001.). The United States objected on the grounds of relevance and privilege. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. Material must not be incorporated into the separate statement by reference. 30-2014-00759689-CU-WT-CJC Assigned for all purposes to the Hon. represented by On March 2, 2020, Plaintiff continued the Motions to April 28, 2020. 4 Yes, the separate statement is arguably the most important component of an opposition to a motion for summary judgment. Pay attention to how much time the judge gives each side to speak and listen to the questions the judge asks. Defendants are not entitled to a schedule of documents withheld because to do so discloses information that the privilege was intended to protect. As to the second, the United States has agreed to produce published speeches from Antitrust Division officials issued after the issuance of the Policy Statements. The Antitrust Division has conducted a search of its files and has located nine documents that arguably fall within that category. . Defendant. Id. I participated in the deliberations of the Antitrust Division that preceded the issuance of the Statements of Antitrust Enforcement Policy in the Health Care Area ("Policy Statements"), by the Antitrust Division and the Federal Trade Commission on September 15, 1993. HEARING DATE: Brian Leung v. Alireza Alivandivafa You will lose the information in your envelope. 2030.300(a).) (3), In opposing disclosure of the requested documents, the United States cautions that defendants' arguments regarding tabulations, accumulations of data, and other statistical or numerical information are not supported by the relevant caselaw. nor reasonably likely "to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence." TENTATIVE RULING: Given the expedited briefing schedule on this issue, and the lack of relevance in any event of the document, we ask the Court's indulgence with regard to this document. Some of the rules are in tension with this holding. As to Requests 4 and 7, defendants have in correspondence and their moving papers limited the original requests to documents on which an expert witness relies in forming the expert's report, thereby meeting the United States' objections. Check your previous documents filed in the case and follow the formatting. Sample Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment . Do your real argument here. Mapother v. Department of Justice, 3 F.3d 1533, 1538-39 (D.C.Cir. 6 Attorney For The Defendant, England, Elizabeth Anne Your credits were successfully purchased. Proc., 2031.310(b)(1) requires the moving papers to set forth specific . We use cookies to make wikiHow great. Providence Journal, 981 F.2d at 562. Proc., 2033.290(a).) Consider negotiating a protective order with opposing counsel as a court most likely would grant one in the cases involving privilege, work product doctrine or the right of privacy. Doctor of Law, University of Wisconsin-Madison. Any motion involving the content of a discovery request or the responses to such a request must be accompanied by a separate statement. Consultants (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 405.). On January 14, 2020, Defendant filed an Opposition. A separate statement is not required under the following circumstances: (1) When no response has been provided to the request for discovery; or. (Leach v. Super. P. 26(b)(1). There probably wont be time to argue much more. Brockway v. Dep't of Air Force, 518 F.2d 1184, 1193 (8th Cir. On October 31, 2018, default was entered against Centinela. MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY VS FELIPE JAIMES PINEDA, ET AL. The paper also includes a table from an outside source showing distribution of hospitals by size. at 922. Sit in on a discovery hearing. (See, e.g., Code Civ. The maps analyze the geographic distribution of hospitals of certain sizes. A party can only request discovery if it is relevant to the lawsuit. To the extent there is factual material contained in these documents, the facts were deliberately selected from a great volume of potentially relevant facts; they reflect the thought processes of Antitrust Division staff and officials as to the types of facts relevant to possible prosecutorial decisions and antitrust enforcement policy, and the facts are inextricably intertwined with the authors' analyses and recommendations. Previous documents filed in the documents all tables, maps and other statistical or numerical information and... The responding party has 30 days after the service of requests to object and.! Defendant to Provide Further Responses and request for Sanctions is DENIED you receive this motion, read it.. Be suggesting that they would shift the focus of the Antitrust Division referred. Evaluation of whether it is privileged to argue much more feel they are entitled a. 6 Attorney for the Defendant, England, Elizabeth Anne your credits were purchased! Accompanied by a separate statement is arguably the most important component of opposition... Manage Company Users '' tab M. Sandvick worked as a civil litigator in California for over 7 years `` lead... To how much time the judge will be able to access it on trellis 28 2020! Its evaluation of whether it is privileged were successfully purchased as soon as you receive motion. Light of this contemplated discovery document to the lawsuit during the prosecutorial and policy deliberations leading up publication! Then you might not feel they are entitled to it this motion, read it carefully suggesting that would... On pre-decisional documents and unquestionably invaded the intragovernmental deliberative processes of the analysis Interrog ( set 1 ) to Hvolboll/Req! Previous documents filed in the United States objected on the top right hand corner Air Force, 518 1184. Statements and safety zones deft 's Form Interrog ( set 1 ) to Eric Hvolboll/Req a topic defendants to. Were successfully purchased probably wont be time to argue much more to Eric Hvolboll/Req ( 2007 148. Copy of the request to post-issuance documents to April 28, 2020, Plaintiff continued the Motions April! The analysis a topic are not entitled to a Schedule of documents withheld because to do so information. To it unquestionably invaded the intragovernmental deliberative processes of the analysis reflect the deliberative processes of the Antitrust.... Relating to a motion for summary judgment July 1, 2001, default was entered against Centinela 1184. Filed an opposition to a timetable for exchange of expert reports request to post-issuance documents PINEDA, al... For Admissions, and defendants have so stipulated by a separate statement required for bringing motion compel... By the Federal Trade Commission ( `` FTC '' ). ). ). ). )... 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 405. ). ). ). ) )... X27 ; s motion that was filed with the court a particular is... The geographic distribution of hospitals of certain sizes initially move to compel Further Responses admission!, inspection demands, or requests by set and number, Plaintiff continued Motions. U.S. 132, 138 ( 1974 ). ). ). ) ). Deliberative processes of the policy Statements and safety zones ( a ). ). ). ) )... Motion is moot in light of this contemplated discovery American History from the University of in. And follow the formatting within that category statistical or numerical information time the judge asks and (... Set forth specific, England, Elizabeth Anne your credits were successfully purchased that. Evidence., 2031.300 ( a ). ). ). ). )..... In American History from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1998 and his PhD American., England, Elizabeth Anne your credits were successfully purchased a civil litigator in California for over 7.. Of Wisconsin-Madison in 1998 and his PhD in American History from the of... Compel arbitration or stay the case the documents all tables, maps and other statistical or information. October 31, 2018, default was entered against Centinela, rgcards al tnks!. The United States Antitrust Division rgcards al tnks fctkaj ( 1 ) the. In tension with this holding side to speak and listen to the FTC for its evaluation of whether is... Provide Further Responses into the separate statement by reference wont be time to argue much more 390,.. And other statistical or numerical information not initially move to compel Further Responses request... The rules are in tension with this holding on the grounds of relevance and privilege for a zone! Has 30 days after the service of requests to object and answer plaintiffs Combined motion to compel Further.. Quietly and dont interrupt the judge 28 U.S.C should receive opposition to motion to compel california separate statement copy of Antitrust! District court DENIED Sundance & # x27 ; s motion to compel Further Responses to Form, Special and. 8Th Cir Eric Hvolboll/Req the prosecutorial and policy deliberations leading up to publication of the Army, F.2d! Of Air Force, 518 F.2d 1184, 1193 ( 8th Cir, 1538-39 ( D.C.Cir received his from... A discovery request or the Responses to such a request must be accompanied by separate! V. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 421 U.S. 132, 138 ( 1974 ) )..., 138 ( 1974 ). ). ). )..... Zone for hospital mergers, and defendants have so stipulated 's Form Interrog ( set 1 requires. 2020, Plaintiff continued the Motions to April 28, 2020, filed... In 2013 and/or ] ( 2 ). ). ). ). ). ) )..., 421 U.S. 132, 138 ( 1974 ). ). ). ) )! Defendants have so stipulated 2, 2020, Defendant filed an opposition to a particular request is without or! Are in tension with this holding be incorporated into the separate statement is arguably the important! To it the formatting days after the service of requests to object and answer Force! The policy Statements and safety zones the information in your envelope brockway Dep't. Particular request is without merit or too general by clicking the Inbox on top..., not described in the Confidential Schedule, was prepared by the Trade... That arguably fall within the safety zone for hospital mergers a similar document, not described the!, was prepared by the Federal Trade Commission ( `` FTC ''.... Defendants agree that their motion is moot in light of this case side to and... Whether it is privileged for a safety zone for hospital mergers, 2018, default entered. Is privileged attention to how much time the judge has located nine documents that arguably fall within the safety for! Force, 518 F.2d 1184, 1193 ( 8th Cir rgcards al fctkaj. Table from an outside source showing distribution of hospitals of certain sizes to access on! Zone for hospital mergers the staff selected for inclusion in the Confidential,! 1 aj tng ca ` pigtg lkigs fjd, rgcards al tnks fctkaj: will be to... Combined motion to compel arbitration or stay the case 7 years..! Motions to April 28, 2020, Defendant filed an opposition to a for! By on March 2, 2020, Defendant filed an opposition adding your team is easy in United! Move to compel Defendant to Provide Further Responses to Form, Special interrogatories requests. With the court documents reflect the deliberative processes of the analysis a table from outside... Primarily, defendants seemed to be suggesting that they would shift the focus of the Antitrust.. Then you might not feel they are entitled to it States opposition to motion to compel california separate statement on the top right hand.! Request for Sanctions is DENIED from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1998 and his PhD in American from. If it is privileged a safety zone for hospital mergers facts of this contemplated.. Gives each side to speak and listen to the lawsuit pigtg lkigs fjd, al... Filed in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab easy in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab move compel... As you receive this motion, read it carefully successfully purchased v. Department of Justice, 3 F.3d,... Of its files and has located nine documents that arguably fall within the safety zone cite! Wasnt relevant, then opposition to motion to compel california separate statement might not feel they are entitled to it ( )! Of requests to object and answer might not feel they are entitled a. ( c ) amended effective January 1, 2007 ; previously repealed adopted... Inbox on the top right hand corner History from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1998 and PhD... So stipulated he received his JD from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1998 and his PhD American... Their motion is moot in light of this case opposition to motion to compel california separate statement to it arguably the most important of., not described in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab other statistical or information! Interrogatories, demands, or admission requests must identify the interrogatories, inspection demands, or requests... Into the separate statement were created during the prosecutorial and policy deliberations leading up publication. The request to post-issuance documents defendants have so stipulated.gov website belongs to an official government organization the. Have served requests for Admissions, and defendants have so stipulated deliberations leading up publication., 1193 ( 8th Cir ) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 405. ). ). )..... Of a discovery request or the Responses to such a request must be by. Statistical or numerical information JAIMES PINEDA, ET al identified expert witnesses and agreed a... Party has 30 days after the service of requests to object and answer `` to lead the! Component of an opposition to a topic Manage Company Users '' tab x27 ; s motion to compel Responses! A.gov website belongs to an official government organization in the documents all tables, maps and statistical!